The lack of truth in the American Media essays

The lack of truth in the American Media essays No one disputes the evidence that on March 19, 2003, President Bush targeted Saddam Husseins bunker in Baghdad and fired the shot heard - - or at least watched - - round the world. Usually topics like this are beyond disputation because the basic contours of the U.S. approach to war already seem clear. Presumably, this clarity and lack of contention is engrafted into the perspectives that we Americans obtain from our mainstream media. Has this coverage of the war in Iraq turned out to be truthful information or has it become a meaningful page-one dissection and exposure of the White Houses claims which can hardly be found in our mainstream media? First is the modern media, with its supposed extensive press coverage of the diplomatic phase, its hundreds of embedded journalists reporting in real time from the battleground, its worldwide network that goes after the story from many aspects, or its multifaceted CNNs on the Internet. Such diverse coverage must bring pride to the media on reporting the information and gathering the evidence that tells the story or proves the facts. Perhaps we are seeing this slant of media pride through a callow and ignorant position. Perhaps we are talking about structural errors or more precisely about intensive political and economic power. A good place to start changing this outlook would be in regard to the corporate media masters who do not see the world or this reality through democratic eyes and never will. The United States mainstream media institutions that filter and otherwise control such an immense share of the domesticated information could simply start by doing one thingby telling t he truth. Imagine, for instance, that President George W. Bushs most optimistic dream comes true. Saddam Husseins authorities are abolished with minimal casualties. We find that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and in fact, meant t...